<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>2021</title>
<link href="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/13203" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/13203</id>
<updated>2026-04-08T14:08:00Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T14:08:00Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF LAW NO. 28 YEAR 2014 REGARDING COPYRIGHT IN REGARDS TO THE CIRCULATION OF PIRATED FILMS</title>
<link href="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12373" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Tampubolon, Joshua Roberto Bahanatua</name>
</author>
<id>http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12373</id>
<updated>2025-12-01T07:33:32Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF LAW NO. 28 YEAR 2014 REGARDING COPYRIGHT IN REGARDS TO THE CIRCULATION OF PIRATED FILMS
Tampubolon, Joshua Roberto Bahanatua
In this current era, entertainment have become easily available for us. With the tap&#13;
of a button, we can watch our favourite films on the computer or on the go with&#13;
your mobile phones. However, this advancement of technology have also made it&#13;
easier for piracy to occur. Especially in Indonesia, where both the pirates and the&#13;
consumers aren’t knowledgeable of the law. As of 2020, Indonesia is ranked 7 in&#13;
numbers of visits to pirate site. Piracy causes companies to lose a lot in revenues,&#13;
and although so far no large studios have gone bankrupt due to piracy, huge number&#13;
of piracies may discourage would-be authors from making film, thus reducing the&#13;
amount of entertainment available to us. This thesis aims to analyse Law No. 28&#13;
Year 2014 Regarding Copyright, find out the faults in either the enforcement or the&#13;
law itself, and find possible ways to fix it.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ELECTRICAL VEHICLE IN INDONESIA: CONFLICT BETWEEN PRESIDENTIAL REGULATION NUMBER 55 YEAR 2019 WITH GOVERNMENT REGULATION NUMBER 73 YEAR 2019 ACCORDING TAXATION ELECTRIC VEHICLE</title>
<link href="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/9045" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Alexander, Samuel</name>
</author>
<id>http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/9045</id>
<updated>2025-12-01T07:03:59Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">ELECTRICAL VEHICLE IN INDONESIA: CONFLICT BETWEEN PRESIDENTIAL REGULATION NUMBER 55 YEAR 2019 WITH GOVERNMENT REGULATION NUMBER 73 YEAR 2019 ACCORDING TAXATION ELECTRIC VEHICLE
Alexander, Samuel
In Presidential Regulation Number 55 of 2019, Article 8 encourages the industrial sector and society to take part in the Acceleration of the Battery Electric Vehicle Program for Road Transportation. The government encourages the public and industry by providing tax incentive assistance both in the process of manufacturing and developing vehicles and charging stations as well as distribution for the industrial sector as well as Motor Vehicle Tax incentives for the community and supporting Indonesia's participation in the UNFCCC (United Nation Framework on Climate Change) which will encourage emission reduction and improve Air quality in Indonesia is in line with the target until 2030. However, this regulation may encounter problems with the enactment of Government Regulation Number 73 of 2019 concerning Taxable Goods Classified as Luxury in the Form of Motorized Vehicles That Can Subject to Tax on Luxury Goods, which states that electric cars are luxury goods, so not all people will be able to buy this electric-powered vehicle, given the terrible air quality in Indonesia, the participation of all people must participate in the Acceleration of the Motor Vehicle Program. Battery electric vehicle for road transportation so that the target to reduce air emissions in Indonesia can be achieved and improve Indonesia's air quality for Indonesia become much better.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LEGAL PROTECTION AND THE ROLE OF THE NATIONAL CONSUMER PROTECTION AGENCY FOR CONSUMERS IN CASES OF COUNTERFEITING OF TRADEMARK ON HAND SANITIZER PRODUCTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC BASED ON LAW NO. 8 OF 1999</title>
<link href="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/9043" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Siregar, Alya Milawati</name>
</author>
<id>http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/9043</id>
<updated>2025-12-01T07:04:12Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LEGAL PROTECTION AND THE ROLE OF THE NATIONAL CONSUMER PROTECTION AGENCY FOR CONSUMERS IN CASES OF COUNTERFEITING OF TRADEMARK ON HAND SANITIZER PRODUCTS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC BASED ON LAW NO. 8 OF 1999
Siregar, Alya Milawati
Based on Law No. 20 of 2016, brands are used to differentiate goods or services. By registering a brand, the resulting product or service will be more easily recognized by consumers. The existence of this Law, it is a foundation that can protect brands in Indonesia. The number of falsified brand disputes in Indonesia can make consumers lose. One of them is the hand sanitizer product, which is very much needed in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Business actors who deliberately counterfeit the hand sanitizer brand have bad intentions. The disadvantage that consumers can experience is that it has side effects on consumer health because the ingredients used may not be up to standard. However, the publics ignorance of the fake hand sanitizer brand circulating in the market causes health or safety losses in the use of hand sanitizer products. Therefore, the Government or consumer protection agencies role in dealing with brand counterfeiting in the community and plays an active role in realizing consumer protection. On the other hand, it is also important to implement consumer protection, which is regulated in Law No. 8 of 1999 to minimize consumer losses. Hence, the aim of this research understands the form of legal protection for consumers who experience losses due to using fake hand sanitizers based on Law No. 8 of 1999 and the National Consumer Protection Agency role in the protection of consumers who have been harmed during the Covid-19 era. By using normative legal research that involves the law. The results of this research analysis reveal that legal protection for consumers is not effective enough, it still needs additional regulations and policies from the Government. Apart from the lack of regulations regarding consumer protection during the Covid-19 period, there is also a lack of public initiative to report complaints to the National Consumer Protection Agency.
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>LEGAL SUMMARY OF THE AYAM GEPREK BENSU CASE BASED ON THE DECISION NUMBER 57/PDT.SUS-HKI/MEREK/2019/PN NIAGA JKT.PST AND THE SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 575  K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2020</title>
<link href="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/9042" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Aulia, Aviliani Nur</name>
</author>
<id>http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/9042</id>
<updated>2025-12-01T07:04:25Z</updated>
<published>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">LEGAL SUMMARY OF THE AYAM GEPREK BENSU CASE BASED ON THE DECISION NUMBER 57/PDT.SUS-HKI/MEREK/2019/PN NIAGA JKT.PST AND THE SUPREME COURT DECISION NUMBER 575  K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2020
Aulia, Aviliani Nur
</summary>
<dc:date>2021-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
