LawLawhttp://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/222024-03-29T13:30:52Z2024-03-29T13:30:52ZTINJAUAN YURIDIS MELALUI PENIPUAN LOWONGAN KERJA ONLINE BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF HUKUM UU NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 DAN KUHPAUDAH, OLIVIA QORINAhttp://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/114742023-05-30T02:31:25Z2017-01-01T00:00:00ZTINJAUAN YURIDIS MELALUI PENIPUAN LOWONGAN KERJA ONLINE BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF HUKUM UU NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 DAN KUHP
AUDAH, OLIVIA QORINA
Penelitian ini untuk menganalisa unsur-unsur penipuan pada lowongan kerja
online menurut KUHPidana dan UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2011dan penerapan
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2011 dalam upaya menegakan hukum dan
menanggulangi kejahatan penipuan lowongan kerja online. Jenis metode digunakan normatif menganalisa peraturan terkait penerapan
Undang-Undang penipuan lowongan kerja online dan data-data lapangan yang
diberikan oleh DPRD Kab.Bekasi. Jenis data digunakan data sekunder yaitu
buku, jurnal dan mengadakan wawancara kepada pemilik penyewaan internet
untuk membuktikan bahwa penggunaan internet sangat murah dan mudah
diakses. Analisis menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif yang akan
menggunakan aspek hukum disertai dengan analisa berdasarkan KUHPidana
dan UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2008. Hasil penelitian penipuan pada lowongan
kerja online menurut KUHPidana dan UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2011 unsur-unsur
pada pasal 378 KUHP, apabila pihak yang menyediakan informasi mengenai
lowongan kerja online tersebut memenuhi unsur-unsur dalam Pasal 378
KUHP, yakni secara melawan hukum memakai nama palsu pada website, dengan tipu muslihat, rangkaian kebohongan, dan menggerakkan pelamar
untuk menyerahkan sesuatu kepadanya, maka pihak yang dirugikan dapat
menuntut secara pidana pihak yang menyediakan informasi lowongan kerja
palsu tersebut atas dasar tindak pidana penipuan. Unsur-unsur pada pasal 28
ayat 1 UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2011perbuatan dengan sengaja memang
terkandung niat jahat dalam perbuatan itu. Unsur lain mensyaratkan berita
bohong dan menyesatkan tersebut mengakibatkan suatu kerugian konsumen
maka dapat dilakukan pemidanaan dalam kasus ini. Hasil penelitian penerapan
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2011 dalam upaya menegakan hukum dan
menanggulangi kejahatan penipuan lowongan kerja online adalah dalam kasus
ini penerapan Undang-Undang untuk pelanggar kasus penipuan lowongan
kerja secara online dikenakan Pasal 28 ayat (1) UU No 11 Tahun 2008 dan
Pasal 378 KUHPidana tetapi kasus ini diterapkan lex specialis derogat legi
generali artinya UU No 11 Tahun 2008 bersifat khusus yang harus ditinjau
terlebih dahulu untuk menjerat tersangka.
2017-01-01T00:00:00ZAuthority of Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK)/Witness and Victim Protection Agency of Indonesia in Providing Protection to Foreign Citizen under Law No. 31 of 2014 (A Case Study of Johanes Marliem, Witness of E-NID Corruption Case)Fintaniahttp://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/114732023-05-30T02:28:20Z2019-01-01T00:00:00ZAuthority of Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK)/Witness and Victim Protection Agency of Indonesia in Providing Protection to Foreign Citizen under Law No. 31 of 2014 (A Case Study of Johanes Marliem, Witness of E-NID Corruption Case)
Fintania
The E-NID application in Indonesia has been distracted regarding to the corruption of Setya
Novanto as the suspect of the E-NID corruption case. Government tried hard to solve this
problem by gathered the suspects and witnesses related to this case including Johannes
Marliem as the foreigner who lived in the United State of America. This thesis will discussed
the protection of witness by Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban (LPSK) / Witness and
Victim Protection Agency of Indonesia using normative-empirical research method by learning
the implementation of Witness and Victim Protection Agency of Indonesia rules and regulation
towards foreigner, in this case: Johannes Marliem. The result consists of the facts delivered
through direct interview with Witness and Victim Protection Agency of Indonesia and
trustworthy sources in a form of journals, articles, and laws with the conclusion that there is no
different way of protection that has been done by Witness and Victim Protection Agency of
Indonesia between local citizen and foreigners.
2019-01-01T00:00:00ZANALISA HUKUM MENGENAI PENGANGKUTAN MUATAN BATAS MAKSIMUMHUTAPEA, ARIEL KRISTIANhttp://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/114102023-05-05T07:41:33Z2022-01-01T00:00:00ZANALISA HUKUM MENGENAI PENGANGKUTAN MUATAN BATAS MAKSIMUM
HUTAPEA, ARIEL KRISTIAN
People's live require movement and movement in various activities, including in the field of transportation. By the nature of urban society in general is dynamic, which is always moving and adapting to changes or existing circumstances. As one of the countries with the highest population density in the world, employment opportunities in Indonesia are not directly proportional to the condition of its population, so the number of unemployed is still high. The development of technology in the business world is an alternative with the availability of online transportation service providers such as GRAB. In the case of a partnership agreement used by partners with GRAB, partners as parties have weak bargaining power while GRAB has strong bargaining power. From a legal perspective, the main problem is that there are no laws and regulations that clearly regulate online motorcycle taxis and partnership agreements between partners and GRAB. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the online motocycle taxi, the aspect of legal protection for partners based on a partnership agreement. With normative juridical research, the author argues that the partnership agreement is an innominate agreement so that in its implementation it must not conflict with the laws and regulations above. The results of the study show that online motorcycle taxis have not yet been regulated in Indonesian laws and regulations, partnership agreements have not provided legal protection for partners and if there is a dispute, legal action can be taken according to the clauses of the partnership agreement.
2022-01-01T00:00:00ZMASA DEPAN PROFESI HUKUM DI ERA DIGITALISASIGANI, ESTHER NATALIAhttp://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/112852023-05-02T09:04:47Z2022-01-01T00:00:00ZMASA DEPAN PROFESI HUKUM DI ERA DIGITALISASI
GANI, ESTHER NATALIA
Technology and digitalisasi modern walk and grow up together. At the digitalisasi modern, the improvement and development of technology is moving so fast. The invention of artificial intelligence and big data can save more and alot information and attack in every aspect and proffesion, especially at law proffesion. Data, regulation and jurisprudence can be easily access with big data and the artificial intelligence can processed the data, and presentation it well and detailed. So, can the artifial intelligence replace law proffesion?. This research method search from jurnal and another books to answer all the questions. The writer will explain the effect of technology that impact the law proffesion and how to survive in this digitalisation era.
2022-01-01T00:00:00Z