<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12149">
<title>2023</title>
<link>http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12149</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12152"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12151"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12150"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-07T11:48:24Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12152">
<title>TEACHERS’ PERCEPTION OF TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) METHOD IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO ELEMENTARY  SCHOOL STUDENTS</title>
<link>http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12152</link>
<description>TEACHERS’ PERCEPTION OF TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR) METHOD IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO ELEMENTARY  SCHOOL STUDENTS
Amelia, Natasha
This study investigates teachers' perceptions on the use of the Total Physical&#13;
Response (TPR) method in teaching English to the elementary school students. The&#13;
purpose of this study is to discuss the perceptions of teachers in teaching English to&#13;
elementary school students and to explore possible contributions of TPR in&#13;
facilitating TEYL. A mixture of methods, quantitative and qualitative, was&#13;
implemented in this study. Data from this research were collected from&#13;
questionnaires and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Questionnaires were distributed&#13;
to 51 Elementary English teachers and FGD data were obtained from 4 teacher&#13;
representatives from the group. The results showed that the majority of elementary&#13;
English teachers have some degrees of familiarity with the TPR method, particularly&#13;
its "practice." For some teachers in the study, however, this method was considered&#13;
new. Specifically based on their practices in the class, the teachers' recalled the&#13;
implementation of TPR and concurred on perceptions that TPR contributed to&#13;
students in facilitating TEYL. Furthermore, this study also discovered specific&#13;
strategies of implementation in teaching English in both lower and higher classes in&#13;
elementary schools.
</description>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12151">
<title>THE IMPACT OF THE USE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING METHOD ON STUDENT PARTICIPATION AND MATH LEARNING OUTCOMES IN  GRADE 5 OF SDN MEKAR MUKTI 05</title>
<link>http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12151</link>
<description>THE IMPACT OF THE USE OF CONTEXTUAL TEACHING AND LEARNING METHOD ON STUDENT PARTICIPATION AND MATH LEARNING OUTCOMES IN  GRADE 5 OF SDN MEKAR MUKTI 05
Musa, Aryneka Toga
The basis of this research is the problem of the poor quality of teaching methods for teachers after&#13;
&#13;
the Covid-19 pandemic. Low student learning outcomes and lack of activity caused by the Covid-&#13;
19 outbreak. The aim of this thesis is to increase student engagement in class and learning&#13;
&#13;
outcomes through contextual learning strategies. Classroom Action Research (CAR) with the&#13;
Kemmis &amp; Taggart model is a research methodology that has been used. Grade V students at SDN&#13;
05 Mekar Mukti in the field of Mathematics have become the focus of this research (36 students).&#13;
Researchers have collected data using assessments to measure student learning outcomes and&#13;
rubrics to measure student engagement. The data has been explained descriptively. The results of&#13;
student activity were 94% ofstudents in cycle 2 which were included in the category of very active&#13;
and active students. As for student learning outcomes, 22% of students in the pre-cycle, 78% of&#13;
students in cycle 1, and as many as 91% of students in cycle 2 achieve full results. According to&#13;
these findings, the targeted goals of 90% of students who met their learning goals were exceeded.&#13;
The research findings support the notion that contextual teaching and learning techniques can&#13;
enhance student engagement and academic performance. According to this study, teachers should&#13;
use contextual teaching and learning strategies to increase engagement levels and academic&#13;
outcomes.
</description>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12150">
<title>ANALYZING ELEMENTARY STUDENTS’ WRITTEN MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION IN SOLVING MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS IN CUBES AND CUBOIDS</title>
<link>http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12150</link>
<description>ANALYZING ELEMENTARY STUDENTS’ WRITTEN MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION IN SOLVING MATHEMATICS PROBLEMS IN CUBES AND CUBOIDS
Siallagan, Santa Lusia
Written mathematical communication refers to expressing mathematical ideas through&#13;
writing. This study aimed to analyze the written mathematical communication in solving&#13;
mathematics problems and understand the characteristics of students’ error in answering&#13;
each question performed by fifth grade students of SD N 05 Puspanegara. This research&#13;
used a qualitative approach with a descriptive qualitative method. This research used the&#13;
purposive sampling technique, which involved 23 students. The data were collected&#13;
through a test that contained three questions representing the third indicator of written&#13;
mathematical communication. The data were analyzed through Miles and Hubermann&#13;
theory (data condensation, data display, and drawing and verifying conclusion). The&#13;
findings of the data pointed out that the students’ written mathematical communication&#13;
ability on cubes and cuboids in this study was not fulfilled to the fullest. The students’&#13;
written mathematical communication ability in solving problems in cubes and cuboids was&#13;
categorized into three categories: 81% for the first indicator (low), 33% for the second&#13;
indicator (low), and 64% for the third indicator (medium). There were two areas that stood&#13;
out as errors that students made in each question. In the first and second questions, there&#13;
was an error in calculating the answer and providing the formula. In the third question, a&#13;
lack of understanding of the concept instructed in the question was cited as an error.&#13;
Therefore, it is important for teachers to improve the written mathematical ability with the&#13;
appropriate teaching methods and identify the characteristics of the students’ errors in&#13;
answering questions so these terms can be used as evaluation for the next material.
</description>
<dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
