JURIDICAL ANALYSIS ON THE ROLE OF THE GENERAL ELECTIONS SUPERVISORY BOARD (BAWASLU) IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE “LUBER JURDIL” PRINCIPLE TOWARD 2014 GENERAL ELECTIONS BASED ON LAW NO. 15 YEAR 2011 CONCERNING ON THE GENERAL ELECTION ORGANIZER

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze and find answers to two things: first, the application of the principle Luber Jurdil (direct, public, free, confidential, honest and fair) part in the electoral process that lead to other forms of violation of law in implementing the election; second, Bawaslu (supervisory bodies elections) role in electoral administration is associated with legislation regarding more specific electoral laws that election organizers. Method approach taken is juridical normative in the sense of research and study such objects through legal sources concerning the law of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945, Election, Legislative Election, President and Vice President, as well as the election of Governors, Regents and Mayor. The reason this method is used is to refine the analysis of data, in order to obtain a certain weight. Another reason, since there are many people who do not understand the problems in applying the principle Luber Jurdil in the electoral process. In this study, specification research is descriptive analysis, which is to reveal the existing legal environment at the moment. Then analyze the juridical by the legislation in force, legal theories are incompatible with the object of discussion. Results of research is the first to be found, Law No. 15 of 2011 on the election organizer is sufficient to apply the principle Luber Jurdil in the process of elections. Second, the form of election law violations that violates the principle Luber Jurdil with election organizers by law. Third, Bawaslu role in the process of election organizers associated with the election organizer Act. Thus, the next election can be run by continuing to participate in the stage of democracy then this will be able to bring the era of democracy in Indonesia at a better stage later on, of course it would be better anyway when voters can choose intelligently based on the science that has been obtained and supported by good ethics is also based on conscience and integrity without any negative things from those who play with a sense of cheating.