President University Repository

ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGMENT ON THE MS GLOW AND PS GLOW DISPUTE REGARDING TRADEMARKS (JUDGMENT NO. 02/ PDT. SUS.IPR / BRAND / 2022 / SBYCommerce Court)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Marbun, Putri Andita Natasyah
dc.date.accessioned 2024-12-05T06:48:08Z
dc.date.available 2024-12-05T06:48:08Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.president.ac.id/xmlui/handle/123456789/12399
dc.description.abstract The Brand is essential for a business because it identifies the things the company researchoffers. This study aims to determine the dispute resolution process in the brand field Law Number 20 of 2016 (Brand) and to find out the process of resolving MS Glow and PS Glow brand disputes regarding decision No. 02/PDT.sus.IPR/Brand/2022. This study is part of normative legal research that uses secondary data sources. The dispute occurs because there is an alignment with the Brand, namely in using the word GLOW. This research uses qualitative methods using primary and secondary data and with a statute approach and case approach. This study's findings indicate that companies must register marks within the scope of business because it is essential to get solid legal protection. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher President University en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Law;017202000013
dc.title ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGMENT ON THE MS GLOW AND PS GLOW DISPUTE REGARDING TRADEMARKS (JUDGMENT NO. 02/ PDT. SUS.IPR / BRAND / 2022 / SBYCommerce Court) en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Repository


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account