Abstract:
This article discusses the ways in which the Singaporean government has "securitized" internet
governance, drawing on the concepts of securitization theory. By analyzing the unique histories
and prior views that securitizing players bring to the securitization process, it adds value to the
body of literature on securitization theory. This essay focuses on the former military leaders who
are now civilian politicians and policymakers who are responsible for overseeing the governance
of cyberspace, using Singapore as an example. The prevalence of military elites, terminologies,
2
and techniques that have permeated domestic cybersecurity governance institutions are
demonstrated through terminology that refers to cyberspace as a "existential" problem and
important staff appointments with major military histories. The usage of military-inspired terms
like "digital ranges" and "war games" in Singapore is consistent with developments in the global
banking sector, where language with military roots is frequently used to prepare for cyberattacks
on vital information infrastructure. The regulation of online material on social media and Internet
networks, as well as laws to safeguard crucial information infrastructure, are two significant
areas of cyberspace governance that are being assessed. The discussion of a variety of issues
highlighted by the target "audience" of securitization processes, such as civil society and
information infrastructure providers, comes to a conclusion of the study.
