THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SECURITIZATION TO CYBER CRIMES MANAGEMENT IN SINGAPORE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Abstract

This article discusses the ways in which the Singaporean government has "securitized" internet governance, drawing on the concepts of securitization theory. By analyzing the unique histories and prior views that securitizing players bring to the securitization process, it adds value to the body of literature on securitization theory. This essay focuses on the former military leaders who are now civilian politicians and policymakers who are responsible for overseeing the governance of cyberspace, using Singapore as an example. The prevalence of military elites, terminologies,

2

and techniques that have permeated domestic cybersecurity governance institutions are demonstrated through terminology that refers to cyberspace as a "existential" problem and important staff appointments with major military histories. The usage of military-inspired terms like "digital ranges" and "war games" in Singapore is consistent with developments in the global banking sector, where language with military roots is frequently used to prepare for cyberattacks on vital information infrastructure. The regulation of online material on social media and Internet networks, as well as laws to safeguard crucial information infrastructure, are two significant areas of cyberspace governance that are being assessed. The discussion of a variety of issues highlighted by the target "audience" of securitization processes, such as civil society and information infrastructure providers, comes to a conclusion of the study.