Abstract:
In 2011, Myanmar proposed to take the 2014 Chairmanship by swapping
their turn with Laos. This is a deviation to ASEAN Charter article 31 which says
that "the Chairmanship of ASEAN shall rotate annually based on the alphabetical
order of the English names of Member States". By default, Myanmar.s
Chairmanship would have to be in 2016 after Malaysia in 2015. Despite this and
also considering year 2014 is crucial as it is only a year before the plan of the
realization of ASEAN Community, ASEAN approved Myanmar.s 2014
Chairmanship proposal. Therefore, this thesis aims to find out the reasons why
ASEAN endorsed Myanmar.s proposal for 2014 chairmanship
In conducting the research, constructivism theory and institutional
approach from international organization theory are used as theoretical
framework. Through constructivism theory, the ramification of past events is
analyzed. The analysis is conducted particularly by identifying series of events
and change of circumstance that affects ASEAN, Myanmar, and other actors
involved. This is done to identify possible factors affecting ASEAN.s decision to
approve Myanmar.s 2014 Chairmanship proposal. Meanwhile, through
institutional approach from international organization theory, the ASEAN
Charter is used as a guide to analyze the basis of ASEAN.s assessment of the
eligibility of Myanmar.s Chairmanship. ASEAN Charter Article 32, "The Role of
The Chairman," is the particular article which is used in this thesis as ASEAN.s
standard in assessing Myanmar.s eligibility.