Abstract:
Preparing retirement funds is very important in achieving financial security when
entering retirement. Lack of financial preparation often causes financial difficulties
during retirement. Therefore, the planning and management of periodic employee
payments through the pension fund program includes the Normal Contribution and
the Accumulation of Actuarial Liability Normal Contribution as part of the pension
planning calculation. In the context of financing pension funds, two general
methods are used to calculate pension obligations, namely the Projected Unit Credit
(PUC) Method and the Normal Entry Age (EAN) Method. The Projected Unit
Credit (PUC) method considers the participant's length of service and salary
growth. Meanwhile, the Entry Age Normal Method (EAN) calculates pension
obligations based on the age of participating in the pension program. This second
method has a different approach and provides other benefits for both participants.
The calculation results show that the Normal Contribution value using the Normal
Entry Age method remains constant yearly. In contrast to the Projected Unit Credit
method, this value increases with length of service. Actuarial liability values using
the Entry Age Normal and Projected Unit Credit methods increase as years of
service increase, with a more significant increase in the EAN method occurring in
the middle of the year. The Normal Entry Age method is more profitable because
it provides stability and predictability in financial planning. On the other hand, the
Projected Unit Credit Method can be increasingly burdensome for participants due
to the increase in Normal Contributions from year to year.